# of watchers: 25
|
Fans: 0
| D20: 7 |
Wiki-page rating | Stumble! |
Informative: | 0 |
Artistic: | 0 |
Funny-rating: | 0 |
Friendly: | 0 |
2006-07-18 [Evilmonk]: Well I have thought of that. I know [smakeupfx] would vote for the picture he thought was best exectued wether it was mine or not. He isn't caught up with the whole 'hurting peoples feelings' complex, when it comes to that. I think he would be a fair judge, but I am still trying to find a more solid way of judging. It would be ideal if there weren't any relations in the judging. Like my wife, that would not be very fair, she would judge true, but if it came down to her liking both pieces greatly, well guess who she would vote for. Thats rhetorical. Thats the situation I wish to avoid. I want the art to be judged for just that, the art and relation should have nothing to do with it.
2006-07-18 [Evilmonk]: I know a lot of folks are going to say it doesn't but I just dont know how much stock I put into that. I think its like hiring a convict, its one of those things that business CLAIM they won't discriminate against, but they do anyways. I am still thinking it through. Opening the polls to the public would again only turn it into 'who has the bigger friends list wins'. I am open to ANY thoughts about this, as it is becoming an issue.
2006-07-18 [Mom]: You could always pick an X amount of artist that you respect and think would vote fairly . Have them memebers of a forum and when a contest comes up notify them and have a closed poll ...one for forum members only.
2006-07-18 [Evilmonk]: Thats as good a plan as any so far. Actually I like it a lot better if I don't even know who the judges are! Someone want to be a judge wrangler? I'll pay! (In the form of fictional currency: Creds) I also thought about having a 1- 10 point system. No 9.5's or anything like that. A judge would give a rating of 1 being poor through 10 being perfection on different catagories like technique, detail, dynamics, anatomy or things like that. How does that sound?
2006-07-18 [Mom]: I feel we need to make the judging as easy as possible so they will volunteer and Vote. If its too much work they are going to shrug it off.
2006-07-18 [Evilmonk]: This is true....
2006-07-18 [Evilmonk]: I would like the Judges to be SET JUDGES though. 3 or 5 good ET folks that can be permenant judges. Volunteers will be evaluated and appreciated. ;)
2006-07-18 [Mom]: Kewl...
2006-07-18 [smakeupfx]: Oh I would be compleatly a fair judge... unless I can see how one would clearly benifit me, but yeah, other than that... compleatly fair
2006-07-18 [Evilmonk]: *slips smakeupfx 5 dollars under the table* *head nod* :D
2006-07-18 [Perplexity]: HO HO! I saw dat!
2006-07-18 [Evilmonk]: *looks around*Dwha!?!
2006-07-18 [Mom]: A Fiver...damn your cheap.
2006-07-19 [Evilmonk]: Hey!? This was supposed to be a shady, back alley under the table kind of thing......whe
2006-07-19 [Yuriona]: *nudges Evil and whispers* Hey boss, where's my cut?
2006-07-19 [Evilmonk]: *whispers* quiet you,*slap* oop...sorry. The jig is up, they're on to us. (I had an 'Old School' moment there.) =)
2006-07-19 [Yuriona]: Ooooo! I didn't know this job came with perks! xD
2006-07-21 [Cia_mar]: roflol!!
2006-07-21 [Evilmonk]: Oh and it was rude of me not to respond to TheRogue's comment so I'll say this. Damn tootin I'm good enough...but will my work be good enough? It gives me goosebumps to know that I can lose just as easily as win. I'm all excited now!!! : D
2006-07-21 [Yuriona]: Good thing I keep lots of wet wipes on hand for just such an occasion. *hands moist towellette to Monk*
Show these comments on your site |
Elftown - Wiki, forums, community and friendship.
|